They say a Picture is worth 1000 Words !Obama won't even Salute our Flag.
Mean while, our Troops are willing to Give there Life's for Our Flag !
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Obama The Muslim, And our Flag !
They say a Picture is worth 1000 Words !Obama won't even Salute our Flag.
Mean while, our Troops are willing to Give there Life's for Our Flag !
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
The Year is 2006 And The Democrats Party
The Buck Stops At Their Door-step!
The Year is 2006. The Place is the USA. The Party involved; The Democrats Party!
What They Said Was = You Vote us in, and give us the House and senate and “We will Lower the Price of Gas! The Price of Gas in the Year 2006 was around “””$2.06”” a Gallon!
Well, the people of the USA Voted the Democrats In, and put them “In Charge” of the House and Senate, to lower the price of Gas “From Around $2.06 A Gallon”
So ask Yourself, How did They Do?
What Is the Price Of Gas Now?
How much does it cost to fill your Car up, compared to the Year 2006?
Now, Fast-Forward to the Year 2008. And a Democrat says
VOTE Me in For “Presidents of the United States of America”
And We will make Things Better !
The Year is 2006. The Place is the USA. The Party involved; The Democrats Party!
What They Said Was = You Vote us in, and give us the House and senate and “We will Lower the Price of Gas! The Price of Gas in the Year 2006 was around “””$2.06”” a Gallon!
Well, the people of the USA Voted the Democrats In, and put them “In Charge” of the House and Senate, to lower the price of Gas “From Around $2.06 A Gallon”
So ask Yourself, How did They Do?
What Is the Price Of Gas Now?
How much does it cost to fill your Car up, compared to the Year 2006?
Now, Fast-Forward to the Year 2008. And a Democrat says
VOTE Me in For “Presidents of the United States of America”
And We will make Things Better !
Sunday, February 24, 2008
A Little More on Political Correctness And Guns
Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
~~By unnamed Person
Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
~ Thomas Jefferson
Wherever there is a jackboot stomping on a human face there will be a well-heeled Western liberal to explain that the face does, after all, enjoy free health care and 100 percent literacy.
~John Derbyshire
If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous?
~~By unnamed Person
~~By unnamed Person
Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
~ Thomas Jefferson
Wherever there is a jackboot stomping on a human face there will be a well-heeled Western liberal to explain that the face does, after all, enjoy free health care and 100 percent literacy.
~John Derbyshire
If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous?
~~By unnamed Person
Monday, January 14, 2008
Bush Administration Backs "Gun-Regulation!!
Bush administration backs gun regulation !!!!!
A D.C. ban on home handguns may not be constitutional, the solicitor general tells the Supreme Court, but rights are limited and federal firearm restrictions should be upheld.
By David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer January 13, 2008
WASHINGTON -- In their legal battle over gun ownership and the 2nd Amendment, gun- control advocates never expected to get a boost from the Bush administration. But that's just what happened when U.S. Solicitor General Paul D. Clement urged the Supreme Court in a brief Friday to say that gun rights are limited and subject to "reasonable regulation" by the government and that all federal restrictions on firearms should be upheld.Reasonable regulations include the federal ban on machine guns and other "particularly dangerous types of firearms," he said in the brief. Moreover, the government forbids gun possession by felons, drug users, "mental defectives" and people subject to restraining orders, he said."Given the unquestionable threat to public safety that unrestricted private firearm possession would entail, various categories of firearm-related regulation are permitted by the 2nd Amendment," Clement said. He filed the brief in a closely watched case involving Washington, D.C.'s ban on keeping handguns at home for self-defense.The head of a gun-control group said he was pleasantly surprised by the solicitor general's stand. Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Handgun Violence, said he saluted the administration for recognizing a need for limits on gun rights. Alan Gura, a key gun-rights advocate who is leading the challenge to the District of Columbia's gun law, expressed disappointment at the administration's position. He said he was troubled that Clement advised the justices to send the case back for further hearings in a lower court."We are not happy. We are very disappointed the administration is hostile to individual rights. This is definitely hostile to our position," Gura said.This year, for the first time, the court is expected to rule squarely on whether the 2nd Amendment gives individuals a right to have a gun despite laws or ordinances restricting firearms.In the past, this amendment has sometimes been read as protecting only state militias. It says: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The case before the court tests the constitutionality of the District of Columbia's unusually restrictive ordinance. Clement, the Bush administration's chief lawyer before the court, agreed that the 2nd Amendment "protects an individual right to possess firearms, including for private purposes unrelated to militia operations." D.C.'s ban on handguns goes too far and is probably unconstitutional, he added.A ruling along these lines would be a major victory for advocates of gun owners' rights.But the solicitor general devoted most of his brief, filed late Friday, to urging the court to move cautiously and to make clear that the 2nd Amendment does not threaten most current restrictions on guns and gun owners.Clement also said the court should stop short of striking down the D.C. ordinance on its own. Instead, he said, the case should be sent back to a trial judge. "The D.C. ban may well fail constitutional scrutiny" he said, because it totally forbids private citizens from having a handgun at home. But such a ruling should not threaten other laws, he said. "Nothing in the 2nd Amendment properly understood . . . calls for invalidation of the numerous federal laws regulating firearms." Under Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft, the Bush administration in 2001 switched the Justice Department's long-standing support for gun control and adopted the view that the 2nd Amendment protects individuals' gun rights.The solicitor general holds an unusual position in the government. He is an appointee of the president in the Justice Department, representing the administration's view in court. At the same time, he has a duty to defend the laws passed by Congress, including in this instance the restrictions on machine guns and who can own a firearm. The solicitor general is also an advisor to the Supreme Court. And usually, the briefs filed by his office carry more weight with the justices than any others.The court will hear arguments in the D.C. case in late March.david.savage@latimes.com
A D.C. ban on home handguns may not be constitutional, the solicitor general tells the Supreme Court, but rights are limited and federal firearm restrictions should be upheld.
By David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer January 13, 2008
WASHINGTON -- In their legal battle over gun ownership and the 2nd Amendment, gun- control advocates never expected to get a boost from the Bush administration. But that's just what happened when U.S. Solicitor General Paul D. Clement urged the Supreme Court in a brief Friday to say that gun rights are limited and subject to "reasonable regulation" by the government and that all federal restrictions on firearms should be upheld.Reasonable regulations include the federal ban on machine guns and other "particularly dangerous types of firearms," he said in the brief. Moreover, the government forbids gun possession by felons, drug users, "mental defectives" and people subject to restraining orders, he said."Given the unquestionable threat to public safety that unrestricted private firearm possession would entail, various categories of firearm-related regulation are permitted by the 2nd Amendment," Clement said. He filed the brief in a closely watched case involving Washington, D.C.'s ban on keeping handguns at home for self-defense.The head of a gun-control group said he was pleasantly surprised by the solicitor general's stand. Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Handgun Violence, said he saluted the administration for recognizing a need for limits on gun rights. Alan Gura, a key gun-rights advocate who is leading the challenge to the District of Columbia's gun law, expressed disappointment at the administration's position. He said he was troubled that Clement advised the justices to send the case back for further hearings in a lower court."We are not happy. We are very disappointed the administration is hostile to individual rights. This is definitely hostile to our position," Gura said.This year, for the first time, the court is expected to rule squarely on whether the 2nd Amendment gives individuals a right to have a gun despite laws or ordinances restricting firearms.In the past, this amendment has sometimes been read as protecting only state militias. It says: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." The case before the court tests the constitutionality of the District of Columbia's unusually restrictive ordinance. Clement, the Bush administration's chief lawyer before the court, agreed that the 2nd Amendment "protects an individual right to possess firearms, including for private purposes unrelated to militia operations." D.C.'s ban on handguns goes too far and is probably unconstitutional, he added.A ruling along these lines would be a major victory for advocates of gun owners' rights.But the solicitor general devoted most of his brief, filed late Friday, to urging the court to move cautiously and to make clear that the 2nd Amendment does not threaten most current restrictions on guns and gun owners.Clement also said the court should stop short of striking down the D.C. ordinance on its own. Instead, he said, the case should be sent back to a trial judge. "The D.C. ban may well fail constitutional scrutiny" he said, because it totally forbids private citizens from having a handgun at home. But such a ruling should not threaten other laws, he said. "Nothing in the 2nd Amendment properly understood . . . calls for invalidation of the numerous federal laws regulating firearms." Under Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft, the Bush administration in 2001 switched the Justice Department's long-standing support for gun control and adopted the view that the 2nd Amendment protects individuals' gun rights.The solicitor general holds an unusual position in the government. He is an appointee of the president in the Justice Department, representing the administration's view in court. At the same time, he has a duty to defend the laws passed by Congress, including in this instance the restrictions on machine guns and who can own a firearm. The solicitor general is also an advisor to the Supreme Court. And usually, the briefs filed by his office carry more weight with the justices than any others.The court will hear arguments in the D.C. case in late March.david.savage@latimes.com
Monday, December 24, 2007
The Selling of America
George Bush and other politicians care nothing about the security of the United States! I don’t use those words “Lightly I have been hoping he would show a “Turn-Around” on the way he has been running the USA.
George Bush and other politicians are continuing to destroy our country simply out of greed. Our Companies are closing down as fast as they can, and relocating Over-Sea’s to where ever the labor is the cheap.
Mean while, foreigner are coming over here to the USA and Buying the House’s that the “Out-Of-Work” people can’t afford because of the jobs relocating over-sea’s. If you think that “I’m OK because “I have a Job Or I have a house, take a Close look at your bank Account. What ever you had in their last year, the money is worth Less now, and going lower ever week.
It’s like the politicians are Stealing your money, right out of the bank, but they won’t do any Jail -Time
Don’t even talk to me about the Sorry Democrats’ Hell, they are even worst!
The Only thing that is going to save this Country is to Clean-House and Vote them ALL out of office!
George Bush and other politicians are continuing to destroy our country simply out of greed. Our Companies are closing down as fast as they can, and relocating Over-Sea’s to where ever the labor is the cheap.
Mean while, foreigner are coming over here to the USA and Buying the House’s that the “Out-Of-Work” people can’t afford because of the jobs relocating over-sea’s. If you think that “I’m OK because “I have a Job Or I have a house, take a Close look at your bank Account. What ever you had in their last year, the money is worth Less now, and going lower ever week.
It’s like the politicians are Stealing your money, right out of the bank, but they won’t do any Jail -Time
Don’t even talk to me about the Sorry Democrats’ Hell, they are even worst!
The Only thing that is going to save this Country is to Clean-House and Vote them ALL out of office!
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Liberty And Freedom
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. ..Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."
Every man is responsible for defending every woman and every child. When the male no longer takes this role, when he no longer has the courage or feels the moral responsibility, then that society will no longer be a society where honor and virtue are esteemed. Laws and government cannot replace this personal caring and commitment.In the absence of the Warrior protector, the only way that a government can protect a society is to remove the freedom of the people.And the sons and daughters of lions become sheep."
Every man is responsible for defending every woman and every child. When the male no longer takes this role, when he no longer has the courage or feels the moral responsibility, then that society will no longer be a society where honor and virtue are esteemed. Laws and government cannot replace this personal caring and commitment.In the absence of the Warrior protector, the only way that a government can protect a society is to remove the freedom of the people.And the sons and daughters of lions become sheep."
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Michigan man Wins the "Idiot Of The Year Award !
Shooter says he mistook cow for coyote
Thu Nov 22, 7:26 PM ET
A man says he shot and killed a neighbor's cow after mistaking it for a coyote.
Authorities and the owner are skeptical.
The undersheriff in northern Michigan's Benzie County says he doesn't see how anyone could confuse a 1,400-pound, pregnant cow with a coyote, which typically weighs 20 to 45 pounds.
And anyway, shooting coyotes is illegal during deer-shooting season. Authorities asked the county prosecutor to bring charges.
The 42-year-old man told authorities he was out to shoot coyotes near his home Saturday when he killed the cow, Undersheriff Rory Heckman said. Heckman said the man then tried to drag the cow home.
"The part of his story he his holding to is he shot at a coyote. I don't know how he hit a several-thousand-pound cow mistaking it for a coyote," Heckman said.
The cow, named Hannah, had wandered away from her farm.
"My husband thought that he should go through some therapy looking at repeated pictures of cows and coyotes, because they look nothing alike," said owner DeAnn Mosher. "It didn't make any sense to me
Drum-Roll Please....I think we could All agree that this man should win the
"Idoit Of the Year Award.
NOTE: That goes to show you " Never Wear a Fur-Coat when in the state of Michigan ! "Big-Grins"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)